John Gowdy writes, "Assumptions about human behaviour that members of market societies believe to be universal, that humans are naturally competitive and acquisitive, and that social stratification is natural, do not apply to many hunter-gatherer peoples. Original affluent society Anthropologists identify egalitarian cultures as " kinship -oriented," because they appear to value social harmony more than wealth or status. These cultures are contrasted with economically oriented cultures including states in which status and material wealth are prized, and stratification, competition, and conflict are common. Kinship-oriented cultures actively work to prevent social hierarchies from developing because they believe that such stratification could lead to conflict and instability.
Often the terms gender inequality and gender stratification are used interchangeably. There are a variety of approaches to the study of gender stratification. Scholarly debates focus on which dimensions of inequalities are most relevant The theory of stratification the level at which inequalities are generated and maintained i.
Researchers have been challenged to explore gender, race, and class inequalities from an intersectional perspective, rather than treating gender as independent of race and class. There is little acknowledgment of the heteronormativity that is present in gender stratification research. Perhaps that will change once data regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression becomes more widely available.
In this section, we present key areas of gender stratification research. Gender stratification can be examined at the level of individual outcomes and interactions or with a macro perspective that compares indexes of gender inequalities across countries.
Although welfare states research examines many aspects within and across societies, it provides important insights in how state policies can shape patterns of gender stratification.
Although we provide examples of research noting gendered health disparities are outcomes of gender inequalities within societies, not all health research makes this connection. Research on crime as well as migration and citizenship has traditionally focused on men. Yet a recent shift to include women more explicitly and gender more broadly has great potential to inform other areas of research on gender stratification.
Crompton writes that a mere cultural approach to gender inequalities ignoring class is also flawed.
Blumberg argues that economic dimensions of inequality are paramount, as they precede inequalities in other domains. Keister and Southgate posits that gender is often seen as one dimension of stratification.
However, Risman and McCall argue for an intersectional approach where gender is analyzed across all dimensions. In addition to questions about which dimensions of inequality are important for stratification, the level at which to examine gender stratification is also a key aspect of scholarly debate.
Some scholars compare men and women within couples, others men and women within societies, and West and Zimmerman makes a compelling argument that gender and, by extension, gender inequality is created in everyday interactions.
Nevertheless, Blau, et al. The book makes a strong argument that it is problematic, if not impossible, to examine class properly without also examining gender and race.
A foundational work on intersectionality.
Brinton, and David B. The declining significance of gender? Macro-level mechanisms economics, organization, politics, and cultureshape gender stratification and our perception of gender inequality. All essays show how macro-level mechanisms and individual outcomes are linked and need to be considered jointly.
A general theory of gender stratification.
She argues that a class orientation is crucial in gender research and should not be merely replaced by a new focus on sexuality. A contemporary approach to race, class, and gender.
Their discussion of the persistence of gender inequality in education, paid work, and within families is very accessible.Classical Theories of Social Stratification. Article shared by: Commenting on the theory of Marx, T.B.
Bottomore (Classes in Modern Society, ) has observed: “For the past eighty years Marx’s theory has been the object of unrelenting criticism and tenacious defence.” This observation remains true even today.
The Structural-Functional Theory of Social Stratification. Below are the seven propositions that make up the structural-functional theory of social stratification (Davis and .
Gender stratification refers to the social ranking, where men typically inhabit higher statuses than women. Often the terms gender inequality and gender stratification are used interchangeably. There are a variety of approaches to the study of gender stratification.
Most of the research in this area. A summary of Theories of Stratification in 's Social Stratification and Inequality. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Social Stratification and Inequality and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
Theories of Stratification. For centuries, sociologists have analyzed social stratification, its root causes, and its effects on society. Theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed about the nature of class, in . Test your knowledge on the theory of social stratification with this interactive quiz and printable worksheet.
These practice assets will help you.