Was the american civil war inevitable

Corona, California Hard to say if we're talking the period there was the Crittenden Compromise and the Corwin Amendment both of which would have made slavery legal forever the former failed but the latter actually got approval and even Abraham Lincoln supported going as far as to send letters to governors of the seceded states about this amendment so there was one possible way to avert civil war by passing either amendment into law. As far as events that could have started the Civil War much earlier yes it was inevitable given the differences between North and South there was the debate over Missouri which when James Tallmadge of New York had an amendment that would have banned slavery in that state it actually passed the House of Representatives but rejected in Senate, Thomas Jefferson even spoke that the crisis over Missouri rung him like a fire bell in the night though there was less potential for secession though.

Was the american civil war inevitable

Do you need a similar quality academic paper? Hire Me at http: Laszlo 2 Ever since the first shots at Fort Sumter on April 12the Civil War has been regarded as one of the most influential and significant events in the history of the United States.

No wonder that tens of thousands of books, scholarly works, recollections and manuscripts have vigorously been published ever since, for those years had been formative enough, if not essential, in creating the America that most of us inhabit today.

Because of such differing views, richness of sources, recollections and the lack of credible and certifiable evidences, it Was the american civil war inevitable hard to form any meaningful view about whether the Civil War was inevitable or not.

This short essay, however, will attempt to put the whole problem into perspective and highlight those aspects which may have contributed to the outbreak of this conflict.

I will simply present facts, causes, results and my personal opinion on whether the problem could have been avoided or not. Although, this personal view might differ from that of other scholars' and historians' who would and could totally disapprove of all that I have to say in this short essay, we must not forget that the topic of the "War Between the States"-as Southerners named it- has so much sentimental value in the minds of countless of Americans that it is a serious undertake to say anything at all without hurting anyone's feelings.

However, given the richness of scholarly investigations into the subject, a lot of works forget the meaning of objectivity and try to dig deeper on a subjective level, which could hurt the validity and accuracy of past recollections and events.

My job and goal here is not to affect anyone's belief or view regarding the possible causes of the CW, but rather provide those facts that might have contributed a great deal to this 5-year armed conflict between the Northern and Southern states.

Laszlo 3 In the following, I will highlight three important reasons -from which one is rather collective in nature- that had a direct effect on the course of events before and during the Civil War.

Probably, the very first and most important one is the issue of slavery, the second includes the social, political and economic reasons, and finally, the territorial expansion with all its implications.

When it comes to dealing with the question of whether the American Civil War was inevitable or not, we immediately think of the pros and contras that might have had serious effects on the outbreak of this armed conflict.

Before digging deeper into the depths of reasons and effects, it is essential to clarify the notion of what the terms Northerners and Southerners mean. According to Edward Pessen, we tend to think of North and South as figures of speech that distort and oversimplify a more complex reality of what these entities really include.

Was the american civil war inevitable

Both territories included a lot of different states with different sections embracing a lot of different regions and communities that were further different in climatic, topographical, demographic, and social characteristics.

This line sliced the territory of the contemporary United States by the Northern latitude of 36 degrees 30 minutes. This line basically severed the slave-holding states of the South from the free states of the North.

Although, in order to understand the political reason behind the outbreak of the Civil War, a few state names should and will be mentioned for the sake of emphasis later on. This might not be true in itself, but there is still something to it. Slavery was central to the Southern economy, and without it, it could never compete with the industrial North.

Although the value of agricultural products was almost equal, Northern manufactures, railroad systems, urban development and commercial profits far surpassed any economic advancement the South had.

The amount of capital the slaves states invested in cotton doubled between andwhich was a lot higher than the rate of the actual contemporary population growth. Slave labor was the only means of equaling the national rate of profit, and making it more competitive against the rapidly advancing North.

America was not unfamiliar with slavery and slaveholding. This kept on going until when the 13th Amendment to the constitution was added claiming that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for 2 Matt Rosenberg, "Mason-Dixon Line: Parties in the North, — Laszlo 5 crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

America, with the coming of the Westward Expansion and the Manifest Destiny idea, it felt the urge to expand. Both the Northern and Southern states wanted a share of the new discoveries and territories, but the question of whether those states admitted and added to the territory of the Union or Southern states should remain free or become slave-holding ones had remained a sensitive spot of discussion.

The Northwest Ordinance, enacted in established the equal apportionment of the states between the two sides with territories north of the Ohio River belonging to the North as free states, and everything south of that to the Southern states as slave-holding regions; untilthe two regions were equally divided with eleven states each.

Although, new discoveries of territories came with the need to equally divide the newly acquired territories for avoid further conflict. This took place with the Missouri Compromise that added Maine to the Union while it gave Missouri to the Confederates.

Thus, the conflict was averted once more. This was followed by the Mexican War and another accord named the Compromise ofwhich admitted the newly acquired territory of California to the Union, and it also allowed the newly acquired territories to decide whether they want to become free or slave states.

This compromise managed to avoid another conflict but all it finally did was to postpone it. Stoddard and Daniel P. Social, economic and political reasons were as significant as those relating to slavery.

Between andmillions of African-Americans were taken from their homeland to be used as valuable labor force and items of property. South was very much dependent on African- American labor that was an immediate result of the invention of the Cotton Gin by Ely Whitney.

This tool allowed slaveholders to make larger profits on cotton production, and this is why slave ownership became so widespread in the South. This still does not justify the widespread and romanticized belief that surrounds the South as a land of large plantations and plantation owners or African-Americans working in collaboration, peace, unity and common respect with their masters.

The list of similar misconceptions and beliefs could further be continued, although, this confirms my aforementioned belief that history and historiography sometimes distorts facts based on individual, emotional and subjective recollections.Transcript of Was the Civil War inevitable? Was the Civil War inevitable?

by Porter Fasoldt Reason 2: Compromise of Reason 3: Secession Yes, the Civil War was inevitable Reason 1: Sectionalism The south depended on slavery to fuel their economy.

They had mostly small plantations and needed a.

Was the American Civil War 'Inevitable?' | Page 8 | American Civil War Forums

The Simple Reason Why A Second American Civil War May Be Inevitable. by Tyler Durden. Fri, 04/21/ - 0. SHARES. Authored by Daniel Lang via rutadeltambor.com, Our nation has clearly never been this divided since the Civil War.

A lot of people noticed it after the last election, but the truth is that these divisions have been deepening. Was the American civil war inevitable? The civil war was inevitable, only however, after one key event; the cotton gin made the civil war inevitable.

Was the American Civil War Inevitable? | Laszlo Szabo - rutadeltambor.com

The invention of the cotton gin in was the key element which enabled the south to have sufficient vested interest in their traditional lifestyle in order to feel the need to defend it at all /5(1). The Civil War was an inevitable conflict because of numerous dissimilarities between the North and South concerning governments, slavery and society development.

Was The American Civil War Inevitable Essay. Was the Civil War inevitable? by Porter Fasoldt Reason 2: Compromise of Reason 3: Secession Yes, the Civil War was inevitable Reason 1: Sectionalism The south depended on slavery to fuel their economy. They had mostly small plantations and needed a lot of labor to generate income.

In some ways, it seems inevitable that the Civil War would happen because of the rising tensions between the North and the South. It is impossible to know for sure whether or not the American Civil War was inevitable and the topic is debated at length among scholars.

It also seems possible that.

The Simple Reason Why A Second American Civil War May Be Inevitable | Zero Hedge